Reading was an important pastime in the Regency. With more leisure came more time. And more reading.
In Heyer’s Cotillion, the heroine has had more than enough leisure time at her guardian’s dreary country house, with nothing but her governess’s bookshelf to entertain–and educate her. She elicits the aid of the hero, who, if he can be persuaded to enter into a pretend engagement with her, will take her to London. There she might have the opportunity to bring the dilatory Mr. Westruther up to scratch.
“No, dash it!” protested Mr. Standen. “Not if you’re engaged to me, Kit!”
She became intent on smoothing the wrinkles from her gloves. Her colour considerably heightened, she said: “No. Only–If there did happen to be some gentleman who–who wished to marry me, do you think he would be deterred by that, Freddy?”
“Be a curst rum touch if he wasn’t, ” replied Freddy unequivocally.
“Yes, but–If he had a partiality for me, and found I had become engaged to Another,” said Kitty, drawing on a knowledge of life culled from the pages of such novels as graced Miss Fishguard’s bookshelf, “he might be wrought upon by jealousy.”
“Who?” demanded Freddy, out of his depth.
“Anyone!” said Kitty.
“But there ain’t anyone!” argued Freddy.
“No,” agreed Kitty, damped. “It was just a passing thought, and not of the least consequence! I shall seek a situation.”
What you read during the Regency was generally held to be informative of your character. In the case of Jane Austen’s novels, you might recall the sensible Anne Elliott in Persuasion enjoys prose and views Mr. Benwick’s inordinate fondness for poetry with a little alarm. Her father, on the other hand, “never took up any book but the Baronetage.”
Then again, too much reliance shouldn’t be placed on a person’s reading selections as a guide to their makeup. This next series of posts is intended to illustrate how diverse a real Regency book can be, and its reader as well. For instance, a novel might deliver a moral tale better than a collection of the vicar’s sermons from Harrow-on-Gate. Also, females thought to be flighty because of their penchant for Gothic tales suddenly reveal themselves to have a will of iron.
Just ask the Honorable Frederick Standen.
“What you read during the Regency was generally held to be informative of your character.” Might that be the case today? Romance readers?
I don’t know that people place such importance on what someone is reading today as they did then. The proliferation of other media may have something to do with that.
Loved that book!! Great post, Angelyn. Tweeted.
Cotillion is one of my favorites. Thanks, Ella!
Love reading books about the Regency period! Great post, Angelyn!
I’m glad you enjoyed the post, Lana.
Thoroughly enjoyable post, always glad to find someone else who enjoys the delights of Georgette Heyer, one of my favourite authors :). Freddy is perfect, I especially love when Kitty describes a knight in shining armour as rather impractical, in comparison to Freddy who proves indispensable in moments of a social crisis!
I wish I could meet Freddy. He’s one of my favorite heroes–and Heyer is one of my favorite authors. She’s subtle and very clever. Thanks for stopping by!
I had forgotten the egotistical Mr. Elliott in Persuasion only read the Baronetage. Is that not masterful?
Absolutely, Cheryl. A father who is obsessed with himself and his rank misses out on one of the most beautiful stories of the Regency–his daughter’s.
Pingback: Regency Poetry: Nuances of Sensibility | Angelyn's Blog