“It is difficult to think of a novelist who makes reading a more animating part of her characters’ lives than Jane Austen.”
–John Mullan, What Matters in Jane Austen?: Twenty Crucial Puzzles Solved (2013)
We know how Northanger Abbey’s heroine, like Cotillion’s Kitty, was much guided by knowledge gleaned from novels and therefore committed foibles as a result of such reliance. Or Fanny of Mansfield Park who had rather more learning from books than those rich Bertram girls who supposed her ‘stupid at learning.’ Already mentioned is Sir Elliot of Kellynch Hall in Persuasion whose reading was limited to the Baronetage and so, too, was his conversation. Recall in Pride and Prejudice Miss Bingley’s spectacular attempts at diverting Mr. Darcy from his book when a day earlier she had attacked our darling Lizzie for not playing cards because she loved books.
I did not understand the significance of reading in Jane Austen’s world until it was illuminated by Professor Mullan: being literate during the Regency means reading books. In Sense and Sensibility, Lucy Steele is illiterate not because she can’t read, but because she does not read.
“Lucy’s ignorance of books will be as much a torment to poor Edward, her future husband, as her cunning and self-interestedness.”
This blog has mentioned the value of book collecting during the Regency, A library of any size was a mark of distinction because it conferred upon those who had access to it an erudition valued in those days. Professor Mullan points out that Austen had no more than two years’ formal schooling but yet had access to her father’s library which was vast for a country clergyman.
One must suspect that her admiration for books and reading must reflect what Regency readers must have thought:
“I only mean what I have read about. It always puts me in mind of the country that Emily and her father travelled through, in The Mysteries of Udolpho (Penguin Classics). But you never read novels, I dare say?”
“Because they are not clever enough for you — gentlemen read better books.”
“The person, be it gentleman or lady, who has not pleasure in a good novel, must be intolerably stupid.” — Mansfield Park
I really need to read that book by John Mullan. I am glad to know that being a bibliophile, I have something in common with Regency folks. Thanks for an interesting blog on Jane Austen.
he is very perceptive–his research in depth. I know so much more about the Regency because of him.
Lovely post. I like the definition of illiterate.
Who would have thought? I’m glad you came by, Ella!
Definitely ,mirrors my own definition of illiterate! There are so many people in my world who choose not to read and I truly think they have no idea what they are missing.
Reading is considered such a mechanical activity these days. It will never achieve the standing it once had during the Regency.
Interesting post, I have now learned something new today which I shan’t forget :).
I’m so glad. You are kind to stop by!
Excellent post. But yours always are!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on carolegill.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, dear–I’m very late in responding to your nice comment and compliment of reposting–thank you so very much.
Pingback: The Regency Interpreter tackles Mansfield Park pt.11 - Random Bits of Fascination
Pingback: The Real Regency Reader: Jane Austen by Angelyn Schmid